Several former Justice Department attorneys seek elected office — some to fight policies enacted by Trump
The Fight Over Policy: A Legal Journey of ComplicityIn an extraordinary legal battle, former Justice Department attorneys have entered the political arena, seeking election in a bid to challenge policies enacted by President Trump. These attorney-run offices reflect a growing theme of political pressure and accountability within Congress, where some lawmakers consider the gravity of their actions.
The DOJ, established in 1963, was established in part to combat corruption and ensure justice. However, its role has faced criticism for mismanagement, particularly regarding voter suppression in border safety initiatives. The former attorneys representing these agencies are now seeking to engage again, appealing for stronger laws against immigration reform, border walls, and healthcare issues, all of which the DOJ is supposed to handle.
The rise of political tension stems from a desire for accountability and a desire for more transparency within the bureaucracy. These lawyers argue that holding the DOJ accountable strengthens its reputation and ensures that its policies are lawful and effective. However, supporters of Trump point to initiatives like border wall construction and proposed immigration reform as key areas where these laws could be strengthened.
In 2017, Sarah Silver, a former DOJ employee who served as an odd jobsman, successfully raised a lawsuit against the DOJ, arguing that they engaged in voter suppression through policy decisions. Her case highlights the legal battles these lawyers face, which are often taken out of the DOJ's control and into the public eye.
This legal battle is part of a broader trend where Congress is increasingly considering the role of employees within government agencies. It underscores the urgent need for accountability and transparency beyond the bureaucracy to address significant societal issues. By taking matters into their own hands, these former attorneys are aiming to hold tough-talking politicians accountable for their actions, whether through public office or beyond.
In conclusion, this legal battle is not just about fixing policies but about fostering a more transparent and just political landscape. It serves as a call to action for Congress to address the systemic issues affecting our communities and to hold those who shape laws and government decisions to account.
------
